PROTECTION COORDINATION · CANADA
Relay Coordination Study for Canadian Facilities
Protection coordination decides which device clears a fault and how long it takes. Grade it one way and a local fault trips the whole plant. Grade it the other way and clearing times stretch, raising incident energy at every downstream location and pushing your CSA Z462 PPE categories up with it.
Free ConsultationWhat a Canadian Coordination Study Has to Achieve
Selectivity and clearing time pull against each other. The study is where that trade-off is made deliberately rather than by accident.
What We Deliver
Selectivity, device by device
The device nearest the fault should operate first. Grading time-current characteristics through the system keeps an upstream device holding while the downstream one clears, which is what keeps a local fault local.
WHAT GOES WRONG
Where Coordination Studies Fail
Coordination problems generally reveal themselves during a fault, which is the most expensive possible moment to find them.
- Settings modelled from design documents rather than recorded as found.
- Selectivity optimised with no regard for the resulting incident energy.
- Utility upstream protection characteristics assumed rather than obtained.
- Instantaneous elements left enabled where they defeat grading.
- Study not revisited after relays were replaced or re-set.
- CSA Z462 labels issued from assumed clearing times rather than coordinated ones.


THE OUTCOMES
What the Report Contains
The deliverable is a settings schedule the site can actually apply, with the curves that justify it and the arc flash consequence of each choice stated alongside.
- 1Settings as found, recorded per device
- 2Time-current curves showing graded operation
- 3Recommended settings schedule for implementation
- 4Clearing times at each location
- 5Resulting incident energy for CSA Z462 assessment
- 6Province, utility protection data and its source
How We Run a Canadian Coordination Study
Build on a validated model
Coordination needs load flow and short circuit results first, since grading depends on the fault current available at each device.
Record settings as found
Capture every relay and breaker setting as currently applied, including whether instantaneous elements are enabled.
Obtain utility characteristics
Request the provincial utility's upstream protection data, because grading has to hold at the service as well as inside the plant.
Grade and test against arc flash
Develop settings that hold selectivity, then check the resulting clearing times against incident energy so the trade-off is explicit.
Issue an applicable schedule
A settings schedule with curves, clearing times and CSA Z462 consequences, in a form the site can implement and verify.
Industries We Empower
Oil & Gas
Upstream, midstream, and downstream facilities across Canada
Healthcare
Hospitals, clinics, and medical campuses
Data Centers
Tier I through Tier IV facilities
Manufacturing
Production lines and industrial plants
Utilities
Generation, transmission, and distribution
Commercial Real Estate
Office buildings and retail complexes
Education
Universities, schools, and research labs
Government
Federal, provincial, and municipal facilities
Frequently Asked Questions
Grade for Selectivity Without Raising Your PPE Category
We help convert your obstacles into innovative solutions. Future-proof your electrical infrastructure with our innovative solutions.