Skip to content

IEEE 1584 · Engineering

Arc Flash Analysis That Goes The Extra Mile

![](https://carelabz.com/us/wp-content/themes/carelabs-us-0.0.1/resources/shape.png)

Free Consultation

Establishing an electrically safe work condition

NFPA 70E is built around a simple hierarchy: establish an electrically safe work condition, and where that is not feasible, justify energized work and control the hazard. Both halves require knowing the energy.

What We Deliver

Incident energy per working position

Energy is calculated in cal/cm² to IEEE 1584-2018 from the electrode configuration, enclosure dimensions, gap and working distance recorded on site, rather than assigned from a task table with conditions your installation may not meet.

THE HIERARCHY

De-energize first, and prove why not

NFPA 70E treats energized work as the exception requiring justification, not the default. Making that judgment honestly requires knowing what the exposure actually is, which is the one input most sites have never established.

  • Assessment to IEEE 1584-2018 with the model's validity range stated and any extrapolation beyond it identified rather than absorbed silently.
  • Fault current from a short circuit study to IEC 60909, using the available fault current obtained from the serving utility.
  • Both maximum and minimum source conditions assessed, since reduced fault current can fall below an instantaneous threshold and extend arcing duration.
  • Clearing times read from installed devices as actually set, because settings schedules and protective devices diverge over the life of an installation.
  • Installation findings referenced to the NEC, so remediation is expressed in the terms your electrical contractor already works to.
Contact Us

DELIVERABLES

What you receive

A signed engineering report aligned to NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584, issued by the engineer who carried out the field work.

  1. 1Incident energy and arc flash boundary by equipment and working position, with working distance stated
  2. 2Labels meeting NFPA 70E content expectations, with a placement schedule and review date
  3. 3PPE specification per position, referenced to calculated energy rather than a task table
  4. 4Mitigation options for every position above the practical PPE limit, with the clearing-time change each requires
  5. 5The calibrated ETAP model, so a utility or equipment change is re-assessed rather than assumed
Reach Out

How the study runs

01

Identify energized work

We establish which equipment is genuinely worked on energized, since NFPA 70E treats that as the exception and the scope follows from it.

02

Field data collection

Enclosure dimensions, electrode configuration, gap and working distance are recorded with nameplate data, because the result is sensitive to each.

03

Available fault current

The figure is obtained from the serving utility for the service point, and a short circuit study establishes bolted fault current at every bus.

04

Protective device review

Settings are read from the devices and clearing time is taken from the real characteristic at the calculated arcing current.

05

Calculate, label and specify

Incident energy, boundaries and PPE are determined per position, labels are produced, and permit content is prepared where energized work continues.

06

Report and train

Findings are ranked and the qualified persons who work on the equipment are briefed, so labels are understood rather than merely applied.

Industries We Empower

Oil & Gas

Upstream, midstream, and downstream facilities

Healthcare

Hospitals, clinics, and medical campuses

Data Centers

Tier I through Tier IV facilities

Manufacturing

Production lines and industrial plants

Utilities

Generation, transmission, and distribution

Commercial Real Estate

Office buildings and retail complexes

Education

Universities, schools, and research labs

Government

Federal, state, and municipal facilities

Frequently asked questions

The tables carry conditions about available fault current and clearing time that many installations have never verified. Where those conditions are not met, the table can understate the hazard. They are a fallback where no study exists, not an equivalent to one, and the verification they require is most of the work a study does anyway.
The standard points to periodic review at intervals not exceeding five years, and sooner where a change to the electrical distribution system could affect the results. In practice the change trigger matters more than the interval, since a protection setting change or a utility reinforcement invalidates results immediately.
NFPA 70E recognizes it where de-energizing introduces additional or increased hazards, or is infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations. Inconvenience and production pressure are not among them. Having the incident energy quantified is what allows that judgment to be made and documented honestly.
OSHA requires employers to protect workers from electrical hazards and cites NFPA 70E as a recognized industry practice for doing so. A current arc flash study, applied through labeling, procedures and training, is the practical way that protection is demonstrated rather than asserted.

Schedule Your Arc Flash Analysis That Goes The Extra Mile

Tell us about your project.