Skip to content
Power quality · P2-22

Smart Metering & Sub-Metering Strategy

Design of a metering architecture that answers specific questions — tenant billing, departmental allocation, efficiency measurement or compliance reporting — rather than installing meters and hoping the data proves useful afterwards.

What this study establishes.

Metering objectives defined per stakeholder, with the questions each meter must answer.

Meter point schedule with position, accuracy class and measured quantities per point.

Hierarchy design allowing energy balance and reconciliation between levels.

Communications architecture — protocol, topology, data rate and cyber considerations.

Data model defining retention, aggregation and reporting outputs.

Phased implementation plan prioritised by the value of the question each stage answers.

What the work covers.

Design of a metering architecture that answers specific questions — tenant billing, departmental allocation, efficiency measurement or compliance reporting — rather than installing meters and hoping the data proves useful afterwards.

A metering hierarchy that does not close — where sub-meters do not reconcile against the parent within a sensible tolerance — undermines confidence in every number it produces. Designing for reconciliation from the start is what makes the data defensible later.

Deliverables

What lands in your inbox.

01

Metering objectives defined per stakeholder,

Metering objectives defined per stakeholder, with the questions each meter must answer.

02

Meter point schedule

Meter point schedule with position, accuracy class and measured quantities per point.

03

Hierarchy design allowing energy balance and reconciliation

Hierarchy design allowing energy balance and reconciliation between levels.

04

Communications architecture

Communications architecture — protocol, topology, data rate and cyber considerations.

05

Data model defining retention, aggregation and reporting

Data model defining retention, aggregation and reporting outputs.

06

Phased implementation plan prioritised by the value

Phased implementation plan prioritised by the value of the question each stage answers.

Methodology

How we run it.

01

Scope & data capture

We confirm the question the study must answer, agree the measurement or modelling points, and collect what the work depends on: distribution hierarchy and the boundaries that need to be measured; billing, allocation or reporting obligations that drive accuracy requirements; existing metering and bms infrastructure that can be.

Agreed scope · Named lead engineer
02

Measurement & modelling

Engineers carry out the measurement and modelling on site and in software, under operating conditions representative of the problem rather than a single convenient snapshot.

Calibrated model · Raw records
03

Analysis against standard

Results are assessed against IEC 62053 series, IEC 61557-12, ISO 50001 and ISO 50006, with the assessment basis and any measurement uncertainty stated rather than implied.

Compliance position
04

Report & recommendations

You receive a signed engineering report with findings ranked by consequence, the reasoning behind each conclusion, and mitigation options costed so they can be acted on or deferred deliberately.

Signed report · Costed actions
Aligned standards

Assessed against the published limits.

IEC 62053 seriesIEC 61557-12ISO 50001 and ISO 50006IEC 62056 / DLMS-COSEMIEC 62053 seriesIEC 61557-12ISO 50001 and ISO 50006IEC 62056 / DLMS-COSEM
Notes & Queries

Common questions.

01

Typically in one of these situations: tenant recharging or departmental cost allocation is needed and cannot be substantiated; iso 50001 or a sustainability reporting obligation requires measured data; existing meters produce data nobody uses or trusts. If none of these apply, the study is unlikely to be the right next step and we will say so.

02

To scope and run the work we need distribution hierarchy and the boundaries that need to be measured; billing, allocation or reporting obligations that drive accuracy requirements; existing metering and bms infrastructure that can be reused. Where any of it is missing we can establish it on site, which changes the scope rather than blocking the work.

03

Primarily IEC 62053 series, IEC 61557-12, ISO 50001 and ISO 50006, IEC 62056 / DLMS-COSEM. The applicable framework depends on your connection agreement and jurisdiction, so we confirm which applies before measurement rather than after.

Ready to start the engagement?

Tell us about your site and the problem you are seeing. We come back with a fixed scope, a fixed fee, and a named lead engineer.