Energy Monitoring System Assessment
Assessment of an existing energy monitoring installation — whether the meters are correctly installed and configured, whether the data is trustworthy, and whether the system actually delivers the insight it was bought to provide.
What this study establishes.
Meter installation audit — CT ratio, polarity, phase association and scaling per point.
Data quality assessment covering gaps, spikes, frozen values and drift.
Energy balance reconciliation between hierarchy levels.
Review of the analytics and reporting layer against what stakeholders actually need.
Communications and integration health check.
Remediation plan separating installation defects from configuration and reporting gaps.
What the work covers.
Assessment of an existing energy monitoring installation — whether the meters are correctly installed and configured, whether the data is trustworthy, and whether the system actually delivers the insight it was bought to provide.
Reversed or mis-assigned CTs are the most common and most damaging finding, because the data looks plausible while being wrong. An energy balance across the hierarchy exposes it quickly, which is why that check comes before any analysis of the numbers themselves.
What lands in your inbox.
Meter installation audit
Meter installation audit — CT ratio, polarity, phase association and scaling per point.
Data quality assessment covering gaps, spikes, frozen
Data quality assessment covering gaps, spikes, frozen values and drift.
Energy balance reconciliation between hierarchy levels
Energy balance reconciliation between hierarchy levels.
Review of the analytics and reporting layer
Review of the analytics and reporting layer against what stakeholders actually need.
Communications and integration health check
Communications and integration health check.
Remediation plan separating installation defects from configuration
Remediation plan separating installation defects from configuration and reporting gaps.
How we run it.
Scope & data capture
We confirm the question the study must answer, agree the measurement or modelling points, and collect what the work depends on: meter schedule with installed ct ratios and configured scaling; historical data export covering at least one full billing period; access to the monitoring platform and its reporting configuration.
Measurement & modelling
Engineers carry out the measurement and modelling on site and in software, under operating conditions representative of the problem rather than a single convenient snapshot.
Analysis against standard
Results are assessed against IEC 62053 series, IEC 61557-12, ISO 50001 and ISO 50015, with the assessment basis and any measurement uncertainty stated rather than implied.
Report & recommendations
You receive a signed engineering report with findings ranked by consequence, the reasoning behind each conclusion, and mitigation options costed so they can be acted on or deferred deliberately.
Assessed against the published limits.
Common questions.
Typically in one of these situations: monitoring data does not reconcile against utility bills; the system was installed but nobody acts on its output; before relying on the data for savings verification or statutory reporting. If none of these apply, the study is unlikely to be the right next step and we will say so.
To scope and run the work we need meter schedule with installed ct ratios and configured scaling; historical data export covering at least one full billing period; access to the monitoring platform and its reporting configuration. Where any of it is missing we can establish it on site, which changes the scope rather than blocking the work.
Primarily IEC 62053 series, IEC 61557-12, ISO 50001 and ISO 50015, IPMVP. The applicable framework depends on your connection agreement and jurisdiction, so we confirm which applies before measurement rather than after.
Ready to start the engagement?
Tell us about your site and the problem you are seeing. We come back with a fixed scope, a fixed fee, and a named lead engineer.